COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS

传播专著是国家传播协会的同行评审出版物。传播专著出版有助于理解人类传播的原始学术成果。传播专著中的文章应该努力询问有关传播学者所关心的各种复杂问题。期刊特别欢迎传统上将传播学科内的学者分隔开的桥梁问题，以及明确的理论、概念、方法和/或社会重要性问题。对这些问题的处理和回答，包括理论论证、定量和定性的实证研究、修辞和文本分析，以及对任何答案往往具有试探性和部分性质的承认，均表示欢迎。回答问题的方法应与所问问题明确相关，在论证和方法上严格，认识到替代解释，并在更广泛的传播学领域内进行语境化。在考虑通信专著提交材料中提出的问题和答案时，将对有说服力的论据和对通信研究各个领域的读者来说清晰易懂的写作给予额外的重视。有关如何将您的研究提交给通信专著的更多详细信息，请查看我们的作者说明。除非另有特别说明，本杂志的文章都经过了严格的同行评审，包括编辑的筛选和至少两名匿名评审。

Communication Monographs is a peer-reviewed publication of the National Communication Association. Communication Monographs publishes original scholarship that contributes to the understanding of human communication. Articles in Communication Monographs should endeavor to ask questions about the diverse and complex issues that interest communication scholars.The journal especially welcomes questions that bridge boundaries traditionally separating scholars within the communication discipline and that address issues of clear theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and/or social importance.Diverse approaches to addressing and answering these questions, including theoretical argument, quantitative and qualitative empirical research, and rhetorical and textual analysis, as well as acknowledgement of the often tentative and partial nature of any answers, are welcomed. Approaches to answering questions should be clearly relevant to the questions asked, rigorous in terms of both argument and method, cognizant of alternative interpretations, and contextualized within the wider body of communication scholarship. In considering the questions and answers posed in submissions to Communication Monographs , a premium will be placed on cogent arguments and on writing that is clear and understandable to readers across the various areas of Communication research. For more details about how to submit your research to Communication Monographs, please review our Instructions for Authors. Unless specifically indicated otherwise, articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, including screening by the editor and review by at least two anonymous referees.